Offer

From strategy to operations

A short, costed entry point — the blind-spot diagnostic — then the pathways, the programmes and the training. All of it measured across three axes: cost, risk, footprint.

Flash diagnostic

3 to 6 weeks to identify what your IT master plan does not cover.

An exposure review across three axes — cost, risks, footprint — to identify the priorities and frame any work needed to correct course.

Deliverables

  • The critical functions selected and the first map of the dependencies that carry them — vendors and third parties, software components, infrastructure, AI models.
  • Orders of magnitude across the three axes: what these dependencies cost, what they put at risk, what they emit.
  • The blind spots: what your IT master plan does not address, and the trade-offs it will have to rule on.
  • What comes next: what deserves detailed quantification, in what order, and at what cost.
  • A one-hour readout to the executive committee.

Duration

8 to 15 consulting days over 3 to 6 weeks.

How it runs

Interviews, document review, joint construction of dependency graphs, readout workshop.

Possible next steps

Detailed quantification of a given perimeter, contribution to the IT master plan, programme framing, training.

Approach

From the systemic to the operational

The sustainability challenge is twofold: anticipating systemic risks and dealing with them; reducing your own impacts and thereby helping to reduce those systemic risks. The environmental impacts of digital technology and digital operational risks are two questions whose answers are either identical or complementary.

Dependency on a service provider's data centre somewhere is at once a carbon impact and a business continuity risk. AI governance determines tomorrow's environmental footprint and the operational risks of the day after.

Treating these questions as a whole is what makes an organisation last.

What makes this approach possible

Combined expertise across climate issues, risk analysis, information systems architecture and AI. From the production of foresight studies to operational grounding, an experience that makes it possible to work with the board of directors and with technical teams alike.

End-to-end support

01
Strategy & Vision
Systemic reading of the issues, strategic positioning, roadmaps. In the language of executives.
02
Risks & Impacts
Mapping of digital risks and dependencies, measurement of the IT carbon footprint, calculation of consolidated steering indicators.
03
Pathways & Governance
Joint construction of resilience and footprint-reduction action plans, calculation of the sufficiency dividend, structuring of the programme and of its implementation governance.
04
Operations & Training
Operational deployment with the teams on the ground, skills development — from managers to technical teams.
Offer

Two complementary pillars

Pillar 1

Low-Carbon Strategy & Digital Transition

Measure the real footprint of digital technology — including that of AI, which is often poorly estimated — build the decarbonisation pathway and implement it with the teams concerned, and identify the sufficiency dividend.

Measuring environmental impacts

Full carbon assessment of the information system, life-cycle analysis (LCA) of digital services, measurement of the impacts of AI usage. Also mapping of impacts by function and department, scenario-based projections of medium-term carbon emissions, assessment of the induced effects of services ("IT for Green").

Bilan Carbone© / GHG P / LCA CSRD / ESRS AI token models

Low-carbon pathway and environmental governance

Architecture analysis, eco-design of digital services, infrastructure optimisation, low-carbon hosting, implementation of frugal AI policies. Pathway, steering index, cost-benefit studies, calculation of the sufficiency dividend. Transformation programme and operational governance of the transition.

Shift Project sufficiency framework CSRD / ESRS TOGAF© RGESN AFNOR Frugal AI Spec AI Act
Pillar 2

Digital Resilience & Sovereignty

Analyse systemic energy, climate and sovereignty risks and build robustness pathways, fundable through the sufficiency dividend.

Energy-climate risks

Mapping of digital dependencies by strategic function, scenario-based analyses of physical risks, assessment of financial impact — operational discontinuity and rising energy prices. Policies and actions to mitigate risks: relocation, redundancy, sufficiency. Implementation of governance that embeds robustness.

IPCC scenarios TCFD / OCARA© CSRD/ESRS

Dependencies & sovereignty

Mapping of economic and geopolitical dependencies, assessment of operational and cognitive risk. Definition of de-risking pathways, proposal of reversible architectures, studies of alternative solutions — open-source software and AI, "sovereign" clouds. Implementation of governance that embeds strategic autonomy.

Digital Resilience Index TOGAF© DORA AI Act Data Act
Levels of engagement

Strategic advice, operational support and training. For mid-caps and large groups that think long term.

Strategic

For executive committees and boards

You have to arbitrate between operational performance, regulatory constraints and the long-term viability of the organisation. LUTECIUM provides the analytical elements to inform your decisions and to defend them before your board. High-level training on sovereignty, energy-climate and regulatory issues.

Operational

For information systems departments

Digital technology sits at the crossroads of new crises: energy, climate, dependencies. LUTECIUM helps you navigate this new environment and build an architecture and an AI roadmap that are lean, resilient and sovereign, aligned with the group's strategic objectives. Technical training through practice, based on joint construction.

Compliance

For risk, compliance and sustainability functions

Climate, geopolitical and technological risks feed one another. LUTECIUM maps these interdependencies and integrates them into your risk management framework and your reporting obligations. Training on climate risk and regulatory monitoring.

Where do you stand?

Perimeter, critical dependencies, cost, risk, footprint: thirty minutes are enough to frame the diagnostic and decide whether it makes sense for you.

Get in touch